|one publication added to basket |
|Are Marine Group II Euryarchaeota significant contributors to tetraether lipids in the ocean?|Schouten, S.; Villanueva, L.; Hopmans, E.C.; van der Meer, M.T.J.; Sinninghe Damsté, J.S. (2014). Are Marine Group II Euryarchaeota significant contributors to tetraether lipids in the ocean? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111(41): e4285. dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416176111
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. The Academy: Washington, D.C.. ISSN 0027-8424; e-ISSN 1091-6490, meer
|Auteurs|| || Top |
- van der Meer, M.T.J., meer
- Sinninghe Damsté, J.S., meer
The first line of evidence is the presence of GDGTs, including crenarchaeol, in suspended particulate matter (SPM) at 83 m, the archaeal community of which is nearly exclusively composed of MG-II (>94% of archaeal reads) (table 1 in ref. 1) as determined by pyrosequencing. However, according to Lincoln et al.’s definition, all SPM samples <100 m do not contain sufficient archaeal reads (i.e., <1,000) (figure S6 and table S2 in ref. 1) to draw any conclusion. This low abundance of archaeal DNA is also evident from the absence of detectable MG-I 16S rRNA gene copies (figure 2 in ref. 1). It is, however, not surprising that GDGTs were detected in the 83-m SPM sample because the lipid tracers used are core lipids. Core lipids do not occur as such in living cells, where they contain polar sugar and phospho head groups (e.g., ref. 2). Thus, by definition core lipid GDGTs are derived from dead material. The second line of evidence is based upon relating the presence of monohexose GDGTs in two SPM samples (although not the crucial 83-m sample) with archaeal diversity data. Although this approach uses intact polar lipids, it has been shown that monohexose GDGTs are also poor tracers of living archaeal cells (3) because they have a turnover time in the order of thousands of years (4), de facto also representing dead material.This dominance of dead lipid material readily explains the absence of any correlation of total MG-I+MG-II DNA abundance with total GDGT abundance (r2 = 0.06 and 0.04 for 0.3- to 3-µm and 3- to 57-µm fractions, respectively). Furthermore, it explains the much higher abundance of GDGTs in the large particle fraction compared to the small fraction (16–490 vs. 1–20 pg/L), contrasting its lower total archaeal abundance (0.3–1.8 × 105 vs. 1–7 × 105 cells/L) (figure 2 in ref. 1). We conclude that both lines of evidence are based on a comparison of minute amounts of archaeal DNA (often below detection limit) with unsuitable lipid tracers.The dominance of dead material and low abundance of archaeal cells make it impossible to infer the lipid composition of uncultivated MG-II from these samples, let alone to extrapolate this to the global ocean. In contrast, other studies, using abundant archaeal DNA and more suitable phospholipid GDGTs, do show a good match between MG-I DNA abundance and crenarchaeol concentration and not with MG-II (3, 5). Nevertheless, members of the Marine Group III Euryarchaeota have been suggested to contribute to GDGTs 0–3 (3); thus, members of the MG-II may potentially contribute to this pool of GDGTs as well. However, based on the data and arguments of Lincoln et al. (1) this is impossible to infer. The jury is, therefore, still out.