|one publication added to basket |
|Review of the taxonomy of the Calanidae (Copepoda) and the limits to the genus Calanus|Bradford, J.M. (1988). Review of the taxonomy of the Calanidae (Copepoda) and the limits to the genus Calanus, in: Boxshall, G.A. et al. (Ed.) Biology of copepods: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Copepoda. Developments in Hydrobiology, 47: pp. 73-81. hdl.handle.net/10.1007/978-94-009-3103-9_7
In: Boxshall, G.A.; Schminke, H.K. (Ed.) (1988). Biology of copepods: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Copepoda. Developments in Hydrobiology, 47. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht. ISBN 90-6193-654-3. XII, 639 pp. https://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/978-94-009-3103-9
In: Dumont, H.J. (Ed.) Developments in Hydrobiology. Kluwer Academic/Springer: The Hague; London; Boston; Dordrecht. ISSN 0167-8418
Classification > Taxonomy
Calanidae Dana, 1849 [WoRMS]; Calanus Leach, 1816 [WoRMS]
|Auteur|| || Top |
Conflicting systems of classifying the Calanidae (Brodsky, 1972; Bradford and Jillett, 1974) are analysed and a preferred system recommended. Brodsky’s system, based on characters with assumed adaptive and functional significance is rejected as is his claim to have produced a phylogenetic scheme. Bradford and Jillett’s system, based on a variety of characters, results in a coherent classification which aims to be neutral concerning phylogenetic relationships among genera. Species of Calanoides, Calanus, Nannocalanus, and Neocalanus are surveyed and the need for further taxonomic work is assessed.